Malicious Authentication

M

Malicious Authentication is a critical failure point in cybersecurity where an unauthorized attacker successfully exploits or bypasses legitimate access controls to authenticate as a valid user or system. This fraudulent authentication grants the attacker the same rights and access permissions as the genuine user, allowing them to gain an unauthorized foothold, escalate privileges, and execute damaging actions.

How Malicious Authentication Occurs

Malicious authentication is the result of attackers leveraging intelligence gathered during reconnaissance to compromise the authentication mechanism itself.

1. Identity Compromise

This method relies on the attacker stealing the necessary credentials or session information belonging to a real user.

  • Credential Stuffing/Account Takeover (ATO): The attacker uses credentials (usernames and passwords) that were previously leaked in external data breaches (often found on the dark web) and attempts to log in to various services, exploiting the victim's password reuse.

  • Phishing/Social Engineering: The attacker tricks the legitimate user into voluntarily submitting their credentials on a fraudulent login page (phishing) or provides the attacker with enough PII to answer security questions (pretexting).

  • Session Hijacking: The attacker steals an active session token, often by exploiting flaws in a web application's session management, allowing them to hijack the session and assume the user's authenticated identity without ever needing the password.

2. Protocol and Implementation Exploitation

This method involves exploiting technical weaknesses in the authentication system itself.

  • Broken Authentication Flaws (e.g., OWASP Top 10): Exploiting application errors that allow for credential brute-forcing, improper handling of session IDs, or weak password recovery mechanisms.

  • Bypassing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Using sophisticated techniques like MFA fatigue attacks (spamming the user with MFA requests until they accept) or exploiting technical flaws in specific MFA implementations (e.g., token replay).

  • Single Sign-On (SSO) Exploitation: Targeting flaws in the implementation of federated identity protocols (like SAML or OAuth) to forge authentication assertions and gain unauthorized access across multiple interconnected services.

Consequences and Defense

Successful malicious authentication is a critical step following the Initial Access Vector stage and often leads to privilege escalation, lateral movement, and data exfiltration. Defense requires a multi-layered approach that includes strong, unique passwords, ubiquitous Multi-Factor Authentication (especially phishing-resistant MFA), and continuous monitoring of external threat intelligence to detect leaked credentials before they can be used.

ThreatNG directly combats Malicious Authentication by identifying and neutralizing the external factors that enable an attacker to obtain and successfully use compromised credentials. By providing real-time intelligence on exposed passwords and vulnerable authentication portals, ThreatNG enables preemptive action, stopping fraudulent logins before they occur.

ThreatNG's Role in Preventing Malicious Authentication

External Discovery

ThreatNG performs purely external unauthenticated discovery using no connectors. This is the necessary first step for defense, as it finds the organization's exposed entry points and assets that attackers use to facilitate malicious authentication.

  • Example of ThreatNG Helping: An attacker searches for unsecure entry points. ThreatNG's discovery process identifies all external login portals, including Subdomains and Externally Identifiable SaaS applications. This complete visibility ensures the security team knows exactly which entry points require robust security controls (such as MFA) to prevent malicious authentication.

External Assessment

ThreatNG’s security ratings quantify the risks that lead directly to malicious authentication, guiding the prioritization of defense efforts.

  • Data Leak Susceptibility Security Rating (A-F): This rating is heavily influenced by Compromised Credentials.

    • Example in Detail (Credential Stuffing): ThreatNG continuously tracks and assesses all Compromised Credentials associated with employee emails. The poor rating (e.g., "F") immediately quantifies the high risk that an attacker will use these stolen credentials for Malicious Authentication via Credential Stuffing. This dictates an immediate, intelligence-led response to force password resets.

  • Cyber Risk Exposure Security Rating (A-F): This rating directly assesses severe technical flaws that could enable an authentication bypass.

    • Example in Detail (Bypass Vulnerability): ThreatNG discovers an exposed port, such as RDP (Remote Desktop Protocol), on a server with known, unpatched vulnerabilities. This configuration can be exploited to bypass the login portal or session initiation, allowing for unauthorized Malicious Authentication. The poor rating mandates immediate mitigation.

  • Web Application Hijack Susceptibility Security Rating (A-F): This rating checks for application-layer flaws.

    • Example in Detail (Session Hijacking): ThreatNG finds that a public web application is missing the HTTP Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) header. This missing header facilitates Man-in-the-Middle attacks, where an attacker can capture session cookies and perform Malicious Authentication by hijacking an active, legitimate session. The poor rating mandates the fix.

Reporting

ThreatNG's reporting ensures that data on authentication vulnerabilities is translated into strategic, actionable risk-management priorities.

  • MITRE ATT&CK Mapping: ThreatNG automatically correlates all authentication-related findings (leaked credentials, exposed vulnerabilities) with the Initial Access and Persistence techniques in the MITRE ATT&CK framework. This framing emphasizes the criticality of these flaws for malicious authentication.

  • Prioritized Reports: These reports classify findings as High, Medium, or Low risk, ensuring that the highest-impact authentication flaws (e.g., Compromised Privileged Credentials) receive immediate attention.

Continuous Monitoring

Continuous Monitoring of the external attack surface enables the organization to detect new authentication risks in real time, preventing an attacker from successfully staging fraud.

  • Example of ThreatNG Helping: A system administrator mistakenly leaves a development server running with a generic password and an exposed login page. Continuous monitoring detects the new Subdomain and its potential authentication weakness instantly, allowing the team to secure the asset before it can be used for malicious authentication.

Investigation Modules

ThreatNG's investigation modules provide the tools to identify stolen assets and technical weaknesses precisely.

  • Dark Web Presence: This module monitors for Compromised Credentials.

    • Example in Detail: An analyst uses this module to confirm that a high-value user's leaked password is being discussed in a dark web forum. This confirmed intelligence is the necessary signal to trigger an immediate password reset, neutralizing the credential component of the malicious authentication risk.

  • Sensitive Code Exposure: This module discovers public code repositories and uncovers exposed credentials.

    • Example in Detail: ThreatNG finds an exposed API Key or plaintext password within a public Git repository. This compromised Non-Human Identity is a prime target for Malicious Authentication. The module identifies this exposed secret, allowing the organization to immediately revoke the key.

Intelligence Repositories (DarCache)

The repositories provide the necessary external data to confirm and quantify the malicious authentication risk.

  • Compromised Credentials (DarCache Rupture): This repository is the source of truth for measuring the volume and identity of leaked passwords that enable malicious authentication.

  • Vulnerabilities (DarCache Vulnerability): This repository is vital, as it combines NVD, KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities), and EPSS to confirm if a technical vulnerability (like a flaw in an authentication module) is actively being exploited for an authentication bypass.

Complementary Solutions

ThreatNG's external threat intelligence can be integrated with internal security tools to automate the protective response to Malicious Authentication.

  • Cooperation with IAM Solutions: A finding from the Compromised Credentials repository related to a user's leaked password can be sent to an Identity and Access Management (IAM) solution. The IAM system can automatically execute an Intelligence-led MFA Enforcement action, forcing a password reset and immediate enrollment in a phishing-resistant Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) method, immediately blocking the attacker from authenticating.

  • Cooperation with Network Firewalls/IPS: When ThreatNG detects a Threat Precursor Intelligence signal—such as an attacker registering a fraudulent domain to host a credential harvesting page—the associated malicious IP can be sent to a Network Firewall or IPS (Intrusion Prevention System). The firewall can automatically block all traffic from that IP, preventing the initial communication needed to harvest credentials for Malicious Authentication.

Previous
Previous

Market Value Suppression

Next
Next

Executive Impersonation