SEC Cybersecurity Disclosures

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosures

Stop Walking on Fire: Bridge the SEC "Disclosure Disconnect" with Legal-Grade Attribution

Your legal team has likely spent hundreds of hours meticulously crafting your SEC Item 106, Form 10-K, and DEF 14A cybersecurity disclosures. That level of extreme diligence is exactly what corporate leadership requires today. But how do you mathematically guarantee that the flawless legal narrative they wrote matches the technical reality of your external attack surface this exact second? With mandatory iXBRL data tagging now fully in effect for 2025, the SEC's automated systems and investors can instantly parse, compare, and flag inconsistencies in your cybersecurity posture. Given that the SEC filed a staggering 200 enforcement actions in the first quarter of fiscal year 2025 alone, the grace period for manual, "best-guess" compliance is officially over. ThreatNG acts as the "Credit Repair Lawyer" for your cyber posture. We use purely unauthenticated, connector-less discovery to automatically ingest your public regulatory filings and correlate them against your actual perimeter. By eradicating the dangerous "Disclosure Disconnect," we provide CISOs, compliance officers, and MSSPs with undeniable evidence and true peace of mind.

From Liability to Leadership: Defend Your Cybersecurity Narrative, Prove Your Regulatory Posture, and Scale Third-Party Risk Without Friction

Transform from Defensive Operator to "Boardroom Authority" with Continuous Peer Benchmarking

Stop dreading the quarterly board presentation. CISOs often feel defensive in executive meetings, struggling to justify their budgets using obscure technical metrics that CEOs and CFOs do not understand. ThreatNG translates raw cyber telemetry into the exact language of the boardroom: governance, risk management, and regulatory compliance. Because our platform requires no internal agents or complex API integrations, you can instantly generate SEC Filing Reports on your top competitors. You can walk into the boardroom armed with an empirical blueprint showing exactly where your firm leads in risk disclosure and where you lag behind peers. Furthermore, we actively detect Positive Security Indicators, which include Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), to validate the positive claims in your filings. This enables you to command the room with Legal-Grade Attribution.

Eradicate Personal Liability and the Anxiety of Regulatory Audits

Compliance officers and general counsel intimately know the chronic stress of signing off on dense corporate filings, often feeling like they are "walking on fire". One oversight or misaligned boilerplate statement could lead to millions in SEC fines, devastating shareholder derivative lawsuits, and intense personal liability for executives. Don't become the victim of an unaligned corporate strategy. ThreatNG's Context Engine™ automatically parses your complex legal text into a clear, binary matrix, mathematically correlating your stated risk management maturity against your continuously discovered external attack surface. We find the irrefutable evidence you need to prove your regulatory posture is technically sound, ensuring you never get caught flat-footed by an aggressive SEC examiner scrutinizing your newly tagged iXBRL data.

Ditch the Questionnaires: Scale MSSP and Third-Party Vendor Risk Validation Without the Friction

The SEC explicitly refuses to exempt cybersecurity incidents occurring on third-party systems, meaning your supply chain's cyber governance is now your legal problem. Your risk analysts are likely either manually reviewing the complex proxy statements of hundreds of vendors or relying on static questionnaires, which creates an operationally impossible task at enterprise scale. It is time to challenge the status quo and the opaque, unaccountable nature of legacy security ratings agencies. ThreatNG's unauthenticated, connector-less discovery model empowers Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) and enterprise third-party risk teams to automatically ingest and benchmark SEC cybersecurity disclosures for any vendor worldwide. Uncover the hidden governance gaps in your digital supply chain rapidly and effortlessly, uniting your team against the immense burden of manual compliance.

External GRC Assessment Frequently Asked Questions FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ): ThreatNG SEC Filing Report and Item 106 Compliance

  • The "Disclosure Disconnect" refers to the dangerous gap between the sanitized cybersecurity narratives drafted by legal teams for Form 10-K filings and the actual, real-time vulnerabilities present on an organization's external attack surface. If a company claims to have robust risk management processes but has externally visible vulnerabilities, such as exposed cloud buckets or dangling DNS records, it risks severe regulatory penalties. The SEC has demonstrated a highly aggressive enforcement posture regarding these discrepancies, filing 200 total enforcement actions in the first quarter of fiscal year 2025 alone, representing the busiest start to a fiscal year since at least 2000.

  • Starting with 2025 annual reports, companies are mandated to submit their cybersecurity disclosures in the machine-readable Inline XBRL (iXBRL) format. This means that the SEC's automated systems and investors can now instantly parse, compare, and flag inconsistencies in your carefully drafted narratives. Because these qualitative disclosures are now easily searchable data points, organizations must use automated external discovery to mathematically guarantee that their tagged legal text aligns with their technical reality.

  • The enforcement landscape has permanently altered the risk calculus for corporate executives. Even though the SEC voluntarily dismissed its remaining claims against SolarWinds and its CISO in November 2025, legal experts warn that this outcome does not represent a full retreat from the agency's focus on executive-level accountability and internal controls. To achieve true "Sleep Assurance," CISOs must bridge the gap between technical telemetry and business risk. By utilizing tools that provide Legal-Grade Attribution, CISOs can mathematically prove to their boards and auditors that their public legal posture perfectly aligns with their external perimeter.

  • Legacy security ratings platforms often operate like unaccountable credit bureaus, relying on outdated third-party data and scoring methods that lack public validation. Legal-Grade Attribution, powered by ThreatNG's Context Engine, operates differently. It functions as a "Credit Repair Lawyer" for your cyber posture, explicitly correlating technical findings with your business context and qualitative SEC governance disclosures. It provides irrefutable evidence of your true posture rather than a generic, unvalidated score.

  • Validation requires moving beyond internal, claims-based assumptions. ThreatNG utilizes a purely unauthenticated, connector-less discovery model to assess your external attack surface exactly as an adversary or auditor would see it. Simultaneously, the platform's automated document parsing extracts the specific cybersecurity risk and oversight disclosures buried within your Form 10-K and Form DEF 14A filings. The system then correlates these two data streams. Furthermore, ThreatNG actively detects Positive Security Indicators (such as Web Application Firewalls and MFA implementations) to empirically validate the positive governance claims made in your SEC filings.

  • Boards of directors increasingly demand quantitative data to understand how their organization's cybersecurity risk management and oversight compare to industry peers. Because ThreatNG operates without requiring internal agents or API integrations, security leaders can instantly generate an SEC Filing Report on their top competitors. This transforms subjective boardroom discussions into data-driven strategy sessions, allowing the CISO to present a clear matrix showing exactly where the firm leads peers in risk disclosure and where it lags.

  • The SEC's final rules explicitly acknowledge that cybersecurity incidents occurring on third-party systems are not exempt from disclosure, a critical point considering 98% of organizations use at least one third-party vendor that has experienced a breach in the last two years. Manually auditing the proxy statements and 10-K filings of hundreds of vendors is operationally impossible. ThreatNG solves this by replacing static, manual questionnaires with automated, unauthenticated discovery. This allows MSSPs and enterprise risk teams to continuously evaluate the alignment between external risk and SEC disclosure across their entire digital supply chain effortlessly.