ThreatNG Certainty Intelligence

End the Contextual Certainty Deficit: Achieve Legal-Grade Attribution and Irrefutable Security Authority.

For too long, the security industry has been plagued by the Contextual Certainty Deficit (CCD), a reliance on low-fidelity data that forces executive leaders into the Crisis of Context, leaving them unable to justify investments or enforce policy with confidence. This deficit creates a quantifiable economic drain, the Hidden Tax on the SOC, that wastes analyst time on manual verification. ThreatNG Veracity™ is the essential market shift, providing the strategic certainty and operational control required to move beyond guesswork to verifiable, defensible action.

Shift from Risk Negotiation to Defensible Governance

Stop negotiating budgets based on ambiguous security scores. ThreatNG Veracity™ provides Legal-Grade Attribution, systematically resolving the Crisis of Context by fusing technical findings with decisive business intelligence. We correlate your external exposure with publicly disclosed records, including SEC Form 8-K Filings and ESG data, allowing you to translate technical debt into quantifiable financial and regulatory liability. Our Customizable Risk Configuration ensures every score reflects your unique business criticality, delivering the absolute authority and confidence your board demands.

Eliminate the Hidden Tax on Your Analysts

Ambiguity is the most significant drain on your security team’s time and talent. We eliminate the Hidden Tax on the SOC by providing Irrefutable Attribution for every alert. Using patented Multi-Source Data Fusion, the Context Engine™ verifies asset ownership and status externally, such as confirming that an exposed CNAME record is truly inactive or unclaimed on a vendor list, removing the need for costly manual investigation. Your team instantly moves from validating if a threat is real to focusing exclusively on remediating proven risks, drastically reducing burnout, and accelerating threat response.

End Decision Paralysis and Enforce Policy Instantly

Vendor disputes and One-Size-Fits-All Scoring cause operational gridlock. ThreatNG Veracity™ Policy Management replaces static grades with dynamic, enforceable business rules. Use Dynamic Entity Management to define vendor criticality tiers and apply granular scoring multipliers, ensuring your remediation efforts align perfectly with your internal risk tolerance. This guarantees Irrefutable Supply Chain Validation, empowering TPRM teams to move from endless negotiation to immediate, policy-driven action.

External Attack Surface Management (EASM)

Stop Wasting Cycles: Move Your SOC from Investigation to Irrefutable Action.

Your EASM solution finds everything, but does it prove anything? Traditional systems flood your Security Operations Center (SOC) with thousands of ambiguous alerts, forcing analysts into a costly, manual confirmation loop, which is the Hidden Tax on the SOC. ThreatNG Veracity™ ends this waste by transforming technical findings into Irrefutable Attribution, granting your team the immediate confidence to move from perpetual investigation to decisive action.

Eliminate Alert Ambiguity with Verifiable Proof: We leverage Multi-Source Data Fusion and intelligence like KEV and PoC Exploits to validate every finding before it reaches your analysts, confirming real-world exploitability and eliminating the operational gridlock caused by low-fidelity alerts.
Prioritize by Strategic Business Impact: Defeat the One-Size-Fits-All Scoring Problem. Use Customizable Risk Configuration in Policy Management to automatically apply risk multipliers to EASM findings based on your internal business tiers, ensuring resource allocation reflects true strategic importance rather than static technical severity.
Justify Risk with Executive Context: Close the communication gap between technical findings and the boardroom. We inject Strategic Context by correlating critical infrastructure risks (like exposed IPs or credentials) with organizational data, empowering the CISO to report external findings in terms of measurable business liability.

Digital Risk Protection (DRP)

Turn Dark Web Noise into Legal-Grade Authority for Brand Enforcement.

Digital Risk Protection should deliver actionable certainty, not just chase shadows. If you can’t quickly connect a Dark Web mention or brand permutation to verifiable liability, you suffer from the Contextual Certainty Deficit (CCD). ThreatNG Veracity™ transforms DRP from passive monitoring into a platform for strategic enforcement, giving your legal and security teams the Legal-Grade Authority to control your brand’s external narrative.

Establish Legal and Financial Liability: We fuse external risks directly with a high-stakes regulatory context. The Context Engine™ correlates exposed data or sensitive mentions with corporate disclosures, such as SEC Form 8-K Filings and ESG Violations, enabling your legal team to act decisively against threats with quantifiable proof of financial or regulatory impact.
Accelerate Takedowns with Confirmed Proof: Stop waiting for malicious domains to cause damage. Veracity™ achieves Irrefutable Attribution for brand risks by using Multi-Source Data Fusion across domains, emails, and social media, allowing you to instantly prove malicious intent and ownership, thereby shortening the dispute cycle and ensuring swift enforcement.
Gain Granular Control Over Brand Policy Scope: Use Dynamic Entity Management within Policy Management to define and track any entity relevant to your brand, from specific trademarked variations to key executive names, ensuring comprehensive and consistent monitoring that focuses resources exclusively on threats that violate custom, predefined policies.

Security Ratings

End the Crisis of Context: Replace Negotiable Scores with Defensible Risk Justification.

Your current security rating is a subjective grade that often fails to reflect your actual operational risk and cannot withstand executive scrutiny, which is the definition of the Crisis of Context. You deserve an assessment that is aligned with your business and backed by irrefutable proof. ThreatNG Veracity™ replaces One-Size-Fits-All Scoring with a customized, defensible standard that grants you the ultimate authority to justify every security investment.

Justify Investment with Legal-Grade Authority: Veracity™ embeds Legal-Grade Attribution into your security score. The score is determined by data correlated with financial and regulatory liability signals (e.g., SEC Form 8-K Filings), ensuring your reporting translates technical risk into the language of the boardroom for certain strategic funding decisions.
Align Score Weighting to Your Risk Tolerance: Policy Management ends the problem of Inflexible Risk Tolerance. Use Customizable and Granular Risk Configuration to define how heavily a finding impacts the score based on whether the asset is Tier 1 critical, Tier 3 non-essential, or an accepted legacy system, moving beyond a generic grade.

Eliminate Vendor Score Disputes: The Context Engine™ uses Irrefutable Attribution to ensure the data underlying your score is accurate and context-aware. This removes the operational pain of disputing low-fidelity score drops, as the score is based on verified operational context and Multi-Source Data Fusion, accelerating consensus on remediation.

Brand Protection

Secure Your Narrative: Quantify Brand Threats with Legal-Grade Liability Proof.

Brand reputation is a quantifiable asset, yet legacy protection tools treat brand threats as simple mentions, not verifiable liabilities. When counterfeit, phishing, or damaging information appears, the lack of context leads to Decision Paralysis. ThreatNG Veracity™ provides the Legal-Grade Authority to proactively turn every external threat into a clear, actionable liability, moving you from narrative defense to strategic enforcement.

Drive Enforcement with Confirmed Evidence: Analysts should not waste time verifying whether a spoofed domain is active. Veracity’s Irrefutable Attribution uses Multi-Source Data Fusion to provide the certainty needed to accelerate takedown notices, removing the operational friction of the Hidden Tax by delivering real-time, confirmed proof of malicious activity.
Quantify Liability for Legal Action: Ensure your brand score is tied directly to verifiable legal risk. We embed Strategic Context Injection by correlating technical brand infringements (such as domain squatting) with key Lawsuits and ESG Violations, providing the Legal-Grade Authority needed to pursue high-priority legal or regulatory action.
Protect Critical Corporate Assets: Use Dynamic Entity Management within Policy Management to define and track high-value entities, executives, and campaign names. By configuring Customizable Risk Configuration, you ensure the platform prioritizes threats that specifically violate your highest-value brand assets or corporate governance policies, protecting reputation where it matters most.

Cloud and SaaS Exposure

End Cloud Ambiguity: Validate Exposure by Policy, Not Static Scores.

In the cloud, every exposed credential or open S3 bucket is a risk. Still, traditional tools lack the context to distinguish critical threats from irrelevant noise, leading to wasted remediation effort, which is the Hidden Tax on the SOC. ThreatNG Veracity™ eliminates this ambiguity by assessing your Cloud and SaaS exposure with Irrefutable Attribution and prioritizing based on actual business impact rather than a generic severity score.

Policy-Driven Risk Multipliers for Cloud Focus: Veracity™ defeats Inflexible Risk Tolerance. Use Customizable Risk Configuration to apply risk multipliers based on the asset's criticality. An exposed bucket or sensitive configuration on an externally identified Tier 1 cloud service will be prioritized significantly higher, focusing remediation effort where it is strategically mandated.
Gain Legal-Grade Certainty for Cloud Governance: Achieve Legal-Grade Authority for your cloud governance reviews. By correlating high-risk cloud exposures (like unsanctioned SaaS apps) with SEC Form 8-K Filings, Veracity™ helps the CISO translate technical vulnerabilities into verifiable regulatory liability, justifying immediate remediation spending and strengthening GRC compliance.
Eliminate the Hidden Tax of False Positives: Your analysts should not have to manually verify every exposed cloud environment. The Context Engine™ uses Irrefutable Attribution to verify ownership and exploitability of cloud and SaaS findings against intelligence repositories. This certainty drastically reduces the time spent chasing low-fidelity alerts, directly reducing wasted effort in the SOC.

Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM)

Stop Arguing Over Scores: Demand Irrefutable Supply Chain Validation.

The moment a vendor disputes a security rating, your TPRM program enters Decision Paralysis. You are paying a heavy price because your current scores lack the Contextual Certainty needed to enforce policy. ThreatNG Veracity™ replaces subjective grades with Irrefutable Supply Chain Validation, giving your team the control and confidence to accelerate mitigation and manage your critical supply chain with strategic certainty.

End Vendor Disputes with Confirmed Evidence: We eliminate ambiguity by using the Context Engine™ to validate critical findings, such as Subdomain Takeover Susceptibility, by cross-referencing against the Vendor List to confirm if the resource is unclaimed externally. This high-fidelity, specific evidence moves the conversation from argument to swift policy enforcement, cutting mitigation delays.
Align Vendor Risk to Your Governance Policy: Defeat the strategic failure of One-Size-Fits-All Scoring. Use Policy Management to deploy a Customizable and Granular Risk Configuration. Define your vendors using Dynamic Entity Management (e.g., Tier 1, Tier 2), and automatically apply customized risk weights to prioritize findings by vendor criticality.
Justify Decisions with Legal-Grade Authority: Provide your legal team with the most potent evidence available. Veracity™ provides Legal-Grade Attribution, correlating third-party security findings with public SEC Form 8-K Filings and ESG Violations. This ensures high-risk vendor decisions are backed by evidence of demonstrable financial or regulatory liability.

Due Diligence

Transform Due Diligence: Replace Scorecards with Legal-Grade Strategic Proof.

In M&A or critical partnership due diligence, time is money, and ambiguity is catastrophic. Relying on siloed, low-fidelity scores introduces immense risk and slows down decision-making, contributing to the Contextual Certainty Deficit (CCD). ThreatNG Veracity™ delivers the Holistic, Real-Time Assessment and Legal-Grade Authority necessary to rapidly confirm the actual external risk of any target entity with absolute, defensible confidence.

Make Rapid Decisions with Holistic, Real-Time Assessment: We end the problem of Siloed and Stale Data by performing continuous Multi-Source Data Fusion. This ensures your due diligence reports provide an immediate, real-time assessment, correlating data across Technical, Legal, Financial, and Dark Web domains, allowing you to bypass manual correlation and move straight to high-confidence decision-making.
Validate Risk with Legal-Grade, Defensible Evidence: Elevate your diligence reports to the highest standard. Veracity™ provides Legal-Grade Attribution by linking external risks directly to publicly disclosed liabilities such as SEC Form 8-K Filings and ESG Violations. This provides your legal and compliance teams with the irrefutable evidence needed to adjust valuations or justify deal termination accurately.
Apply Your Specific Risk Tolerance to the Target: Use Policy Management to apply your organization's precise risk tolerance to the target being assessed. By leveraging Customizable and Granular Risk Configuration, you can weight findings based on the criticality of the target's business unit or technology stack, ensuring the final risk profile perfectly reflects your internal governance requirements for acquisition or partnership.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ): ThreatNG Context Engine™

The ThreatNG Context Engine™ delivers irrefutable attribution by fusing technical and business intelligence, ending the era of ambiguous security scores. Here are the most frequently asked questions about how the Context Engine solves the most challenging problems in external intelligence.

The Problem of Ambiguity and False Positives (For SecOps & SOC Managers)

The "Attribution Chasm" is the gap between identifying a potential security finding and proving its ownership, criticality, and real-world exploitability. Traditional External Attack Surface Management (EASM) and security ratings rely on low-fidelity, single-source data, leading to vague alerts and high volumes of false positives (noise).
The Context Engine solves this by employing a patent-backed, iterative assessment architecture that operates as a continuous, multi-source evidence-correlation loop. It fuses technical findings (such as an open cloud bucket) with operational, legal, and financial intelligence to deliver irrefutable attribution—the definitive proof required to shift from discovery to remediation confidently.
Unreliable alerts create a "Hidden Tax" on operational expenses, as security analysts must spend limited time manually validating whether low-fidelity alerts are real threats or phantoms. This process leads to analyst burnout and significantly delays the response to actual, pressing security incidents.
The Context Engine eliminates this inefficiency. By providing findings validated with irrefutable, contextual evidence, it drastically reduces the volume of false positives. This frees your analysts from tedious manual investigations, allowing them to focus resources on strategic threat hunting and decisive incident response, effectively transforming the SOC into an efficiency-driven operation.

Strategic Justification and Compliance (For CISOs and Executive Leaders)

Yes. The defining feature of the Context Engine is its ability to provide Legal-Grade Attribution. It moves beyond technical scores by linking external exposures directly to financial and regulatory liability.
Specifically, the Context Engine integrates findings with publicly disclosed organizational data, such as SEC Form 8-K Filings (which report material events) and ESG Violation data. This allows security leaders to speak the language of the boardroom, connecting a technical risk (e.g., Data Leak Susceptibility) to a documented financial or compliance liability, thereby providing the strategic justification needed for budgets and resource allocation.
The Context Engine provides a continuous, outside-in evaluation of Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) posture. By identifying exposed assets and critical vulnerabilities from an external attacker’s perspective, it maps these findings directly to relevant GRC frameworks, including PCI DSS, HIPAA, NIST CSF, and GDPR. This continuous external assurance strengthens your overall compliance standing by proactively uncovering and addressing gaps.

Third-Party and Supply Chain Certainty (For TPRM Leaders)

Successful TPRM hinges on accurate attribution to effectively tier vendors and make high-stakes decisions. For high-risk findings, such as Subdomain Takeover Susceptibility, the Context Engine performs a multi-step validation check:
1. It identifies CNAME records pointing to external services.
2. It cross-references the external service against a comprehensive Vendor List (e.g., AWS/S3, Heroku, Zendesk).
3. It performs a specific validation check to determine if the resource is genuinely inactive or unclaimed on that vendor’s platform.
This process transforms an ambiguous vendor claim into an irrefutable security fact, increasing the accuracy of your vendor risk assessments and allowing for decisive action.

Technical Differentiation and Security

Traditional solutions typically offer a snapshot based on limited data, resulting in irrelevance and an ongoing need for manual analysis. The Context Engine operates on a principle of iterative data fusion. Instead of static scores, it:
- Correlates Data: Uses an extracted assessment attribute (e.g., a domain name) to trigger the retrieval of additional, distinct data types (e.g., legal filings, business ownership, technology stack) from specialized resources.
- Provides Real-Time Certainty: Delivers a contextualized state-of-affairs view of risk, eliminating the dependence on stale, cached information commonly found in the market.
Accessing the Dark Web for intelligence on ransomware groups (DarCache Ransomware) or compromised credentials (DarCache Rupture) poses an operational security risk. The Context Engine provides Controlled Discovery using a proprietary Sanitization Element.
Before providing data to the analyst, the Sanitization Element processes the content to remove active malicious URLs and obscure inappropriate media, saving a navigable, sanitized copy. This ensures your analysts gain access to critical attribution intelligence without introducing operational risk to your environment.