STOP GUESSING: The Correlation Evidence Questionnaire (CEQ) Delivers Legal-Grade Attribution to Resolve the Contextual Certainty Deficit
For CISOs and TPRM leaders, the reliance on static, subjective security questionnaires is a dangerous structural flaw, known as the Contextual Certainty Deficit. These claims-based attestations provide only a "snapshot in time," leaving you vulnerable to threats that evolve hourly and forcing analysts to chase stale, generalized claims. ThreatNG’s Correlation Evidence Questionnaire (CEQ) is the definitive evolution, leveraging our patent-backed Context Engine™ to achieve Legal-Grade Attribution. By fusing real-time external security findings with decisive legal, financial, and operational context, the CEQ transforms generalized policy checks into Precision-Driven mandates, ensuring every action you take is based on irrefutable evidence.
Reclaim Your Budget: Eliminate the Hidden Tax on the SOC
The highest hidden cost in security operations is the manual validation cycle. This is the Hidden Tax on the SOC: the time security analysts spend manually chasing ambiguous findings, attempting to confirm whether a generalized policy gap is real, and figuring out who owns the exposed asset. The CEQ is the solution to this operational waste. By generating questions only after the Context Engine™ has confirmed the exposure, its ownership, and its business impact, we cut the validation loop entirely. You move straight from Certainty Intelligence™ to targeted remediation, restoring valuable security budget and resources previously spent on administrative ambiguity.
Stop Managing Doubt: Enforce Policy with Legal-Grade Attribution
Executive credibility hinges on confidence. When reporting risk to the board or regulators, CISOs cannot afford to operate in the realm of doubt. The CEQ provides the definitive assurance needed to accelerate governance by supplying Legal-Grade Attribution. We correlate technical findings such as an exposed high-privilege machine identity (Non-Human Identity Exposure) or a critical vulnerability prioritized by KEV data with decisive external context, such as a relevant SEC 8-K Filing or a GRC mandate (GDPR/HIPAA). This correlation turns a technical flaw into an irrefutable legal and financial imperative, enabling you to enforce policy and justify security investments with verifiable proof, serving as the essential EASM-to-Audit Translation Layer.
Move Beyond Claims-Based Attestation: Mandate Verified Vendor Action
The era of trusting vendor self-attestation is over. Traditional Vendor Risk Assessment Questionnaires (VRAQs) rely on the vendor's subjective claims, introducing inherent bias and failing to account for the continuous nature of supply chain risk. The CEQ positions ThreatNG and its user as partners against contextual chaos. It is deployed as the standard for evidence-based vendor validation, dynamically generating inquiries about specific, verified third-party exposures. For example, if a vendor has an F-rated Subdomain Takeover Susceptibility due to an abandoned dangling DNS record, the CEQ demands a detailed response and timeline for removing that specific CNAME, forcing auditable action based on irrefutable evidence, not generalized promises.
Frequently Asked Questions: The Correlation Evidence Questionnaire (CEQ)
The Contextual Problem and Necessity
-
The CEQ is designed to resolve the pervasive Contextual Certainty Deficit. This deficit arises because risk management has historically relied on generalized, subjective documentation and self-attestation (known as claims-based attestation), which quickly becomes stale and unreliable. The CEQ replaces this flawed model by beginning with irrefutable, observed evidence of an existing risk before any question is asked.
-
Traditional VRAQs are fundamentally limited because they provide only a "snapshot in time" security posture, instantly becoming obsolete as external attack surfaces continuously evolve. Their generalized nature is disconnected from specific digital assets, leading to a pervasive "checkbox mentality" in which compliance is documented but actual vulnerabilities are often ignored or missed. Furthermore, managing these lengthy, manual workflows frequently causes resource-intensive bottlenecks that delay procurement cycles.
-
The Hidden Tax on the SOC is the significant time and budget drain incurred when security analysts must manually chase ambiguous findings, validate generalized claims, and spend resources attempting to correlate a technical finding with its actual business impact and responsible owner. By delivering Legal-Grade Attribution—which confirms the asset, exposure, and context—upfront, the CEQ eliminates the manual validation burden, allowing analysts to move directly to targeted remediation and enforcement.
The Technology and Core Value Proposition
-
Legal-Grade Attribution is the gold standard of certainty achieved when a technical security finding is verified against decisive, non-technical context (legal, financial, and operational data). This is powered by the patent-backed Context Engine™, which uses Multi-Source Data Fusion to iteratively correlate raw external exposures—such as a critical vulnerability, an exposed port, or a leaked credential—with external public data like SEC 8-K Filings or publicly disclosed Lawsuits. This correlation transforms ambiguous findings into irrefutable, high-stakes mandates.
-
The CEQ is dynamically generated because its content is instantly tailored solely to the most recent, continuous discovery and assessment results captured by ThreatNG for a target organization. Instead of asking if an organization has a generic patching policy, the CEQ might ask: "Provide the remediation timeline for the specific unpatched vulnerability on the subdomain associated with the F-rated Subdomain Takeover Susceptibility risk". This hyper-targeted approach ensures every question addresses a validated, existing risk on the external attack surface.
-
The CEQ operationalizes complex governance metrics, such as the Non-Human Identity (NHI) Exposure Security Rating. When ThreatNG's Sensitive Code Exposure module discovers a high-privilege machine identity (such as a leaked API key or SSH key), the CEQ generates a direct mandate for the asset owner to confirm the incident response workflow and key rotation status, providing an auditable enforcement mechanism for these often-invisible credentials.
Operational and Efficiency Gains
-
The CEQ should be deployed as the standardized mechanism for evidence-based vendor validation. By forcing third parties to respond to hyper-specific inquiries about the exact external exposures contributing to a poor security rating, the CEQ eliminates the need for lengthy exchanges spent arguing over subjective scores. It demands concrete remediation steps against verified findings, streamlining due diligence, and strengthening the supply chain.
-
The CEQ ensures efficient cross-functional cooperation by structuring its hyper-specific inquiries across four business-critical pillars :
Technical: Focusing on configuration, exposure, and asset state (e.g., Are there missing security headers?).
Operational: Focusing on process, ownership, and procedure (e.g., Who is responsible for patching this subdomain?).
Strategic: Focusing on policy, governance, and business justification (e.g., Is there a business justification for exposing these sensitive ports?).
Financial: Focusing on budget, consequence, and investment justification (e.g., Is there a budget to purchase these typosquatted domains?).
-
ThreatNG’s capability includes rich vulnerability intelligence, integrating NVD (technical details), KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities), and EPSS (likelihood of exploitation). The CEQ utilizes this risk-based prioritization to generate questions only for exposures on assets confirmed to be vulnerable and potentially actively exploited, ensuring IT teams allocate resources to the highest-consequence threats, eliminating the need to chase low-priority Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs).
Strategic Governance and CISO Value
-
The CEQ provides Legal-Grade Attribution, which translates esoteric technical risks into tangible business consequences. When correlating a finding with a financial or regulatory document, the CISO receives the irrefutable proof required to justify strategic investments and accelerate governance. It provides the assurance that external risk is managed with certainty, eliminating reliance on doubt when reporting organizational risk posture.
-
ThreatNG’s External GRC Assessment capability maps external risks directly to compliance frameworks such as PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, and NIST CSF. When the Context Engine™ correlates an exposed open cloud bucket (Data Leak Susceptibility) with a specific GRC control violation, the CEQ is generated to demand the documentation proving remediation for that specific control. This creates an auditable trail, ensuring every external finding has an auditable internal response attached.
-
Yes. The CEQ formalizes the response protocol for Digital Risk Protection (DRP) findings. When ThreatNG detects risks contributing to BEC & Phishing Susceptibility (e.g., missing DMARC/SPF records or the availability of brand-related typosquatted domains) , the CEQ routes highly specific questions to the email, marketing, and legal teams, demanding policy validation and remediation steps against a verified brand or financial threat. For example, the CEQ may inquire: “Is there a budget to purchase these typosquatted domains?”.
Discover & Inventory
Continuous Visibility
Report & Share
Collaborate & Manage